← All Teams
KENT
Kent State
Golden FlashesBalancedMid-American Conference0-1#128 (-10.04)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
7· FOverall
Offense
16· DRating
5· FPer play
4· FConsistency
24· DBig plays
Defense
7· FRating
0· FPer play
0· FConsistency
Situational
12· FRed-zone D
34· D3rd down O
1· F3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
-0.042
Opp-Adj Defense
-0.069
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.331
Defensive EPA/play
+0.467
lower = better
Off Success Rate
31.3%
Def Success Rate
66.7%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
19.2%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
22.9%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
-0.798
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
0.00
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
+0.25
expected pts/game
Kicking
+0.21
own kicking game
Kick Defense
-0.01
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.01
own return game
Return Defense
+0.06
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Kent State ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense17th
Opp-adjusted defense7th
Offensive EPA/play5th
Defensive EPA/play0th
Offensive success rate2th
Explosiveness24th
Defensive havoc4th
Points per drive1th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1Marshall2026OA -0.032 / -0.030similar: TD drive rate, passing offense, takeaway rate4202Purdue2024OA -0.029 / -0.062similar: defensive EPA, defensive success rate, TD drive rate3853Colorado2022OA -0.222 / -0.093similar: defensive success rate, TD drive rate, passing offense3634UNLV2020OA -0.027 / -0.044similar: run defense, rushing offense, TD drive rate3615UConn2023OA -0.119 / -0.056similar: rushing offense, TD drive rate, offensive success rate358
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ South Carolina | 0-57 | L | +35.5 | L | 53.5 | O |
| 2 | vs Wofford | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | @ Ohio State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | vs Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | @ South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | vs Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | vs Miami (OH) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
0-1
0.0%
O/U Record
1-0
100.0%
Straight Up
0-1
0.0%
Home ATS0-0
Away ATS0-1
Favorite ATS0-0
Underdog ATS0-1
Last 5 ATS
L
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.300 | 7th | +0.410 | 1th |
| Red Zone | - | 0th | +0.673 | 12th |
| Third Down | -0.125 | 34th | +1.406 | 1th |
| No Garbage Time | -0.276 | 7th | +0.467 | 0th |
| First Half | -0.276 | 12th | +0.467 | 0th |
| Second Half | -0.347 | 7th | +0.356 | 10th |
| Early Downs | -0.229 | 12th | +0.366 | 3th |
| Passing Downs | -0.418 | 9th | +0.529 | 7th |
| Standard Downs | -0.200 | 18th | +0.379 | 4th |
| Goal to Go | - | 0th | +0.798 | 26th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 47.9%Rush 52.1%
Havoc/Game
5.0
Havoc Rate
6.8%
TO Margin
-1.0
Explosive/G
5.0
Yards/Game
179.0
Pts/Drive
0.00
3rd Down%
35.7%
3&Out%
20.0%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Kent State vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Kent State | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 0 | 57 |
| Points / Game | 0.0 | 57.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 10 | 35 |
| Rushing | 4 | 14 |
| Passing | 5 | 20 |
| Penalty | 1 | 1 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 25 | 39 |
| Yards | 100 | 278 |
| Yards / Carry | 4.0 | 7.1 |
| Yards / Game | 100.0 | 278.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 4 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 23 | 33 |
| Completions | 14 | 27 |
| Completion % | 60.9% | 81.8% |
| Yards | 79 | 367 |
| Yards / Attempt | 3.4 | 11.1 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 4 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 81.03 | 215.24 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 48 | 72 |
| Yards | 179 | 645 |
| Yards / Play | 3.7 | 9.0 |
| Yards / Game | 179.0 | 645.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 3 |
| Yards | 0 | 30 |
| Average | — | 10.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 0 |
| Yards | 14 | 0 |
| Average | 14.0 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 8 | 1 |
| Yards | 370 | 37 |
| Average | 46.3 | 37.0 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 1 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 0 | 2 |
| Lost | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 5 | 3 |
| Yards | 35 | 25 |
| Yards / Game | 35.0 | 25.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 25:13 | 34:47 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 14 | 8 |
| Conversions | 5 | 7 |
| Conversion % | 35.7% | 87.5% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Conversions | 0 | 0 |
| Conversion % | — | — |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 0 | 5 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 0 | 5 |
| Score % | — | 100.0% |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 5 |
| TD % | — | 100.0% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Made | 0 | 0 |
| Pct | — | — |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 7 |
| Made | 0 | 7 |
| Pct | — | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Made | 0 | 1 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.