← All Teams
EMU
Eastern Michigan
EaglesPass-HeavyMid-American Conference1-1#120 (-7.21)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
13· FOverall
Offense
7· FRating
14· FPer play
20· DConsistency
9· FBig plays
Defense
45· CRating
67· CPer play
59· CConsistency
Situational
74· BRed-zone O
21· DRed-zone D
12· F3rd down O
48· C3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
-0.077
Opp-Adj Defense
+0.050
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.190
Defensive EPA/play
-0.223
lower = better
Off Success Rate
41.2%
Def Success Rate
40.0%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
15.4%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
17.9%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
+0.033
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
1.50
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
-0.77
expected pts/game
Kicking
-0.37
own kicking game
Kick Defense
-0.31
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.11
own return game
Return Defense
+0.01
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Eastern Michigan ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense7th
Opp-adjusted defense81th
Offensive EPA/play14th
Defensive EPA/play68th
Offensive success rate20th
Explosiveness9th
Defensive havoc61th
Points per drive28th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1Sacramento State2026OA -0.109 / +0.054similar: passing offense, run defense, TD drive rate4382Texas State2022OA -0.153 / +0.039similar: takeaway rate, offensive EPA, run defense3843Troy2021OA -0.126 / -0.004similar: offensive EPA, pass defense, defensive EPA3734Western Kentucky2018OA -0.103 / +0.001similar: takeaway rate, offensive EPA, offensive success rate3595Troy2025OA -0.100 / +0.021similar: offensive EPA, havoc rate, TD drive rate354
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | vs Sacramento State | 28-17 | W | -9.0 | W | 53.5 | U |
| 1 | vs San José State | 21-27 | L | -3.0 | L | 56 | U |
| 2 | @ Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs Lindenwood | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | @ Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | @ Akron | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | vs Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | vs Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | vs Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
1-1
50.0%
O/U Record
0-2
0.0%
Straight Up
1-1
50.0%
Home ATS1-1
Away ATS0-0
Favorite ATS1-1
Underdog ATS0-0
Last 5 ATS
WL
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.190 | 13th | -0.223 | 74th |
| Red Zone | +0.341 | 75th | +0.503 | 21th |
| Third Down | -0.592 | 12th | -0.075 | 49th |
| No Garbage Time | -0.190 | 14th | -0.223 | 69th |
| First Half | -0.202 | 18th | -0.469 | 89th |
| Second Half | -0.174 | 23th | -0.009 | 40th |
| Early Downs | +0.008 | 43th | -0.284 | 80th |
| Passing Downs | -0.426 | 9th | -0.261 | 76th |
| Standard Downs | -0.057 | 34th | -0.192 | 62th |
| Goal to Go | +0.077 | 33th | +0.625 | 33th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 59.6%Rush 40.4%
Havoc/Game
16.0
Havoc Rate
22.5%
TO Margin
+1.0
Explosive/G
10.5
Yards/Game
314.5
Pts/Drive
1.50
3rd Down%
25.8%
3&Out%
35.7%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 2 games — Eastern Michigan vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Eastern Michigan | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 49 | 44 |
| Points / Game | 24.5 | 22.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 34 | 32 |
| Rushing | 11 | 10 |
| Passing | 19 | 21 |
| Penalty | 4 | 1 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 55 | 53 |
| Yards | 176 | 186 |
| Yards / Carry | 3.2 | 3.5 |
| Yards / Game | 88.0 | 93.0 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 1 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 81 | 87 |
| Completions | 51 | 48 |
| Completion % | 63.0% | 55.2% |
| Yards | 453 | 538 |
| Yards / Attempt | 5.6 | 6.2 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 2 |
| Passer Rating | 119.69 | 113.90 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 136 | 140 |
| Yards | 629 | 724 |
| Yards / Play | 4.6 | 5.2 |
| Yards / Game | 314.5 | 362.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 2 | 5 |
| Yards | 16 | 38 |
| Average | 8.0 | 7.6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 4 | 1 |
| Yards | 90 | 15 |
| Average | 22.5 | 15.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 16 | 14 |
| Yards | 634 | 562 |
| Average | 39.6 | 40.1 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 2 | 1 |
| Yards | 9 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 1 | 3 |
| Lost | 1 | 2 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 8 | 23 |
| Yards | 64 | 185 |
| Yards / Game | 32.0 | 92.5 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 31:18 | 28:42 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 31 | 30 |
| Conversions | 8 | 8 |
| Conversion % | 25.8% | 26.7% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 4 | 4 |
| Conversions | 1 | 2 |
| Conversion % | 25.0% | 50.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 4 | 3 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 3 | 3 |
| Score % | 75.0% | 100.0% |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 2 |
| TD % | 75.0% | 66.7% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 3 |
| Made | 0 | 3 |
| Pct | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 7 | 5 |
| Made | 7 | 5 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Made | 0 | 0 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.