Fourth Down Data
Fourth Down Data

Stop reading analysis.
Start running your own.

A research platform for college football. Put any take to the test — weather, betting lines, EPA, every FBS game since 2017.

Sample query
47.6%
of four-touchdown favorites (28+ points) covered the spread since 2017.
n = 777 decided · 370 covers / 407 misses
Historical query result, not a projection.
Run your own version →
1.06M scrimmage plays across 7,760 FBS games — every FBS game from 2017 to 2025

This week

Fresh analysis every week of the season

The Read
Weekly analytical highlights
What the data noticed this week — the storylines, outliers, and trends across college football, in plain language.
Open →
The Recap
The week's results in review
Every completed game from the most recent week — the rare feats, the best single-game performances by EPA, and how the results landed against the pre-game consensus line.
Open →
The Slate
Every game, every Saturday
A data-driven breakdown of every FBS game on the board — featured matchups, statistical storylines, weather watch, and market context.
Open →

Your tools

Precision instruments for building your own analysis

Most Popular
Backtest any scenarioPro
Query Builder
Wonder if home underdogs of 3-7 points actually cover? Test it against every FBS game since 2017. Weather, rest, spreads, performance stats — see the historical record instantly.
Open the Query Builder →
Compare any two teamsPro
The War Room
Alabama vs Penn State this week? See every matchup side-by-side — EPA head-to-head, identity matchup, situational strengths, history back to 2017, and auto-generated insights — all in one page.
Open →
Find historical matchupsPro
The Archive
This week's games — played before. We find 10 historical matchups with the same EPA profile, same talent gap, same spread range. See how they actually played out.
Open →
Query BuilderPro
Research
Filter every FBS game since 2017 by any combination — spread bands, weather, conference, situational splits — and read the full historical record.
Open →
Player QueryPro
Research
The same query engine at the player level — search game logs and statistical leaders across every FBS season since 2017.
Open →
Reality CheckPro
Hype vs. EPA
Where the polls and the play-by-play disagree — team by team, with the receipts.
Open →
Prefer it ready-made? Auto-generated analysis in Insights →

Pricing

Free

$0
  • Team ratings, identity, and situational EPA
  • The Read, The Recap, and The Slate
  • Scores, teams, and leaderboards
  • The Fourth Down Report
Create a free account

Season Pass

$79 one-time
  • Pro through January 31, 2027
  • Every Pro tool: Query Builder, War Room, Archive, Reality Check, Rankings Builder, Player Query
  • One payment — no subscription, no auto-renew
Get the Season Pass

Pro Monthly

$15 / month
  • Full Pro access, billed monthly
  • Cancel anytime
Start Pro Monthly

See it in action

What the data is saying right now

EPA
North Texas: elite offense, struggling defense
North Texas ranks among the best in offense (+1.40 off rating) but among the worst in defense (-0.23 def rating) — the biggest split in FBS.
Explore more insights →

Questions you can ask

The kind of thing your toolkit should let you find out

“How often do home dogs of 7+ actually cover?”
Filter on spread band, venue, and market role for every FBS game since 2017.
Open Query Builder →
“How do these two teams' offenses match up?”
Side-by-side EPA, identity profile, situational tendencies, and historical head-to-head.
Open The War Room →
“Has a game like this one happened before?”
Find 10 historical matchups with the same EPA profile, spread range, and talent gap.
Open The Archive →
Or browse the rankings
Team RatingsSeason DashboardThe Fourth Down ReportTeam IdentityConference StrengthSituational EPARest & TravelBetting InsightsLeaderboards
0M
Scrimmage Plays Analyzed
0
FBS Games
0+
Drives Charted
0
FBS Teams

Every metric on this site is computed independently from raw play-by-play data. Every number is a historical query result — descriptive, never a projection. We don't make predictions. We make them possible.

How the numbers are built →How the ratings validate →Why we built this →

Ready to test your theories?

Every FBS game since 2017. Every result.