← All Teams
SAC
Sacramento State
HornetsBalancedMid-American Conference1-1#88 (-2.05)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
36· DOverall
Offense
9· FRating
8· FPer play
31· DConsistency
18· DBig plays
Defense
59· CRating
73· BPer play
58· CConsistency
Situational
56· CRed-zone O
33· DRed-zone D
22· D3rd down O
84· B3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
-0.109
Opp-Adj Defense
+0.054
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.255
Defensive EPA/play
-0.244
lower = better
Off Success Rate
46.6%
Def Success Rate
38.8%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
17.5%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
19.1%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
-0.011
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
-0.010
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
1.86
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
+1.46
expected pts/game
Kicking
+0.07
own kicking game
Kick Defense
+1.14
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.05
own return game
Return Defense
+0.30
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Sacramento State ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense1th
Opp-adjusted defense84th
Offensive EPA/play8th
Defensive EPA/play74th
Offensive success rate42th
Explosiveness18th
Defensive havoc59th
Points per drive36th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1Eastern Michigan2017OA -0.078 / +0.060similar: havoc rate, defensive success rate, run defense4512Eastern Michigan2026OA -0.077 / +0.050similar: passing offense, run defense, TD drive rate4383Troy2025OA -0.100 / +0.021similar: havoc rate, defensive EPA, turnover rate4254Buffalo2025OA -0.180 / -0.001similar: offensive EPA, defensive EPA, takeaway rate3675Marshall2023OA -0.105 / +0.027similar: offensive EPA, defensive EPA, passing offense366
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | @ Eastern Michigan | 17-28 | L | +9.0 | L | 53.5 | U |
| 1 | vs Mississippi Valley State | 52-0 | W | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | @ Fresno State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | vs North Dakota State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | vs Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | vs Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | vs Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | @ Hawai'i | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
0-1
0.0%
O/U Record
0-1
0.0%
Straight Up
1-1
50.0%
Home ATS0-0
Away ATS0-1
Favorite ATS0-0
Underdog ATS0-1
Last 5 ATS
L
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.153 | 20th | -0.273 | 81th |
| Red Zone | +0.149 | 57th | +0.245 | 33th |
| Third Down | -0.273 | 23th | -0.622 | 85th |
| No Garbage Time | -0.255 | 9th | -0.241 | 73th |
| First Half | -0.428 | 7th | -0.334 | 80th |
| Second Half | +0.153 | 66th | -0.186 | 64th |
| Early Downs | -0.162 | 20th | +0.012 | 34th |
| Passing Downs | -0.357 | 12th | -0.472 | 89th |
| Standard Downs | -0.048 | 36th | -0.132 | 57th |
| Goal to Go | +0.167 | 37th | +0.077 | 66th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 56.4%Rush 43.6%
Havoc/Game
13.5
Havoc Rate
22.0%
TO Margin
-1.0
Explosive/G
9.0
Yards/Game
362.0
Pts/Drive
1.86
3rd Down%
35.7%
3&Out%
31.8%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 2 games — Sacramento State vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Sacramento State | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 69 | 28 |
| Points / Game | 34.5 | 14.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 39 | 27 |
| Rushing | 18 | 9 |
| Passing | 16 | 14 |
| Penalty | 5 | 4 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 58 | 64 |
| Yards | 252 | 173 |
| Yards / Carry | 4.3 | 2.7 |
| Yards / Game | 126.0 | 86.5 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 2 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 75 | 57 |
| Completions | 44 | 36 |
| Completion % | 58.7% | 63.2% |
| Yards | 472 | 322 |
| Yards / Attempt | 6.3 | 5.6 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 123.80 | 122.19 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 133 | 121 |
| Yards | 724 | 495 |
| Yards / Play | 5.4 | 4.1 |
| Yards / Game | 362.0 | 247.5 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 3 | 0 |
| Yards | 23 | 0 |
| Average | 7.7 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 8 |
| Yards | 15 | 120 |
| Average | 15.0 | 15.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 10 | 17 |
| Yards | 395 | 509 |
| Average | 39.5 | 29.9 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 2 |
| Yards | 0 | 1 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 3 | 3 |
| Lost | 2 | 2 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 14 | 15 |
| Yards | 120 | 146 |
| Yards / Game | 60.0 | 73.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 30:20 | 29:40 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 28 | 30 |
| Conversions | 10 | 7 |
| Conversion % | 35.7% | 23.3% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 3 | 1 |
| Conversions | 2 | 0 |
| Conversion % | 66.7% | 0.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 8 | 3 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 7 | 2 |
| Score % | 87.5% | 66.7% |
| Touchdowns | 5 | 2 |
| TD % | 62.5% | 66.7% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 3 | 2 |
| Made | 2 | 0 |
| Pct | 66.7% | 0.0% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 9 | 4 |
| Made | 9 | 4 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Made | 0 | 0 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.