← All Teams
BGSU
Bowling Green
FalconsBalancedMid-American Conference0-1#135 (-18.12)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
2· FOverall
Offense
1· FRating
15· DPer play
53· CConsistency
19· DBig plays
Defense
4· FRating
45· CPer play
48· CConsistency
Situational
18· DRed-zone O
85· BRed-zone D
33· D3rd down O
90· A-3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
-0.093
Opp-Adj Defense
-0.073
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.176
Defensive EPA/play
-0.045
lower = better
Off Success Rate
49.3%
Def Success Rate
42.1%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
17.9%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
0.0%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
-0.132
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
1.30
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
-0.55
expected pts/game
Kicking
+0.08
own kicking game
Kick Defense
-0.34
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.29
own return game
Return Defense
-0.00
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Bowling Green ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense4th
Opp-adjusted defense6th
Offensive EPA/play15th
Defensive EPA/play45th
Offensive success rate54th
Explosiveness19th
Defensive havoc12th
Points per drive18th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1Georgia State2017OA -0.067 / -0.042similar: pass defense, TD drive rate, passing offense3382Western Kentucky2024OA -0.008 / +0.008similar: rushing offense, havoc rate, turnover rate3023Akron2022OA -0.103 / -0.081similar: havoc rate, pass defense, rushing offense2974Wake Forest2023OA -0.025 / +0.010similar: offensive EPA, offensive success rate, TD drive rate2935Eastern Michigan2017OA -0.078 / +0.060similar: TD drive rate, defensive success rate, offensive EPA290
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Tarleton State | 13-20 | L | -2.5 | L | 49 | U |
| 2 | @ Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs South Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | @ Miami (OH) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | vs Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | vs Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | @ Buffalo | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | @ Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | vs Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | @ Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | vs Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
0-1
0.0%
O/U Record
0-1
0.0%
Straight Up
0-1
0.0%
Home ATS0-1
Away ATS0-0
Favorite ATS0-1
Underdog ATS0-0
Last 5 ATS
L
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.176 | 15th | -0.045 | 46th |
| Red Zone | -0.315 | 18th | -0.748 | 85th |
| Third Down | -0.129 | 34th | -0.787 | 91th |
| No Garbage Time | -0.176 | 15th | -0.045 | 45th |
| First Half | -0.158 | 23th | +0.248 | 10th |
| Second Half | -0.189 | 20th | -0.478 | 93th |
| Early Downs | -0.193 | 15th | +0.286 | 7th |
| Passing Downs | +0.002 | 45th | -0.323 | 78th |
| Standard Downs | -0.264 | 12th | +0.073 | 26th |
| Goal to Go | +0.871 | 91th | -1.427 | 100th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 44.8%Rush 55.2%
Havoc/Game
6.0
Havoc Rate
10.5%
TO Margin
-1.0
Explosive/G
12.0
Yards/Game
366.0
Pts/Drive
1.30
3rd Down%
46.2%
3&Out%
10.0%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Bowling Green vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Bowling Green | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 13 | 20 |
| Points / Game | 13.0 | 20.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 21 | 19 |
| Rushing | 4 | 7 |
| Passing | 15 | 9 |
| Penalty | 2 | 3 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 37 | 33 |
| Yards | 104 | 258 |
| Yards / Carry | 2.8 | 7.8 |
| Yards / Game | 104.0 | 258.0 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 30 | 24 |
| Completions | 24 | 16 |
| Completion % | 80.0% | 66.7% |
| Yards | 262 | 206 |
| Yards / Attempt | 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 153.36 | 166.27 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 67 | 57 |
| Yards | 366 | 464 |
| Yards / Play | 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Yards / Game | 366.0 | 464.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 0 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Average | — | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 4 | 3 |
| Yards | 62 | 58 |
| Average | 15.5 | 19.3 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 3 | 1 |
| Yards | 131 | 62 |
| Average | 43.7 | 62.0 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 0 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 2 | 1 |
| Lost | 2 | 1 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 7 | 7 |
| Yards | 65 | 62 |
| Yards / Game | 65.0 | 62.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 34:58 | 25:02 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 13 | 10 |
| Conversions | 6 | 1 |
| Conversion % | 46.2% | 10.0% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 2 | 5 |
| Conversions | 1 | 2 |
| Conversion % | 50.0% | 40.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 3 | 4 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 2 | 3 |
| Score % | 66.7% | 75.0% |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| TD % | 33.3% | 25.0% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 2 | 2 |
| Made | 2 | 2 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 2 |
| Made | 1 | 2 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Made | 0 | 0 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.