← All Teams
TOL
Toledo
RocketsBalancedMid-American Conference0-1#55 (+2.67)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
60· COverall
Offense
69· CRating
66· CPer play
9· FConsistency
63· CBig plays
Defense
55· CRating
49· CPer play
30· DConsistency
Situational
97· A+Red-zone O
57· CRed-zone D
4· F3rd down O
48· C3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
+0.053
Opp-Adj Defense
+0.031
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
+0.150
Defensive EPA/play
-0.065
lower = better
Off Success Rate
36.6%
Def Success Rate
47.0%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
24.4%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
16.9%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
+0.215
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
2.10
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
-0.62
expected pts/game
Kicking
-0.31
own kicking game
Kick Defense
-0.27
vs opponent kicks
Returns
+0.04
own return game
Return Defense
-0.09
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Toledo ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense88th
Opp-adjusted defense71th
Offensive EPA/play66th
Defensive EPA/play50th
Offensive success rate10th
Explosiveness64th
Defensive havoc31th
Points per drive39th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1Stanford2018OA +0.030 / +0.004similar: offensive EPA, defensive EPA, run defense3302Ole Miss2026OA +0.002 / -0.042similar: pass defense, takeaway rate, TD drive rate3153California2019OA +0.044 / +0.040similar: run defense, TD drive rate, takeaway rate3144Florida State2019OA -0.009 / +0.034similar: turnover rate, defensive EPA, havoc rate3035Oregon State2026OA +0.042 / -0.008similar: pass defense, havoc rate, TD drive rate301
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ Michigan State | 20-30 | L | +10.5 | W | 47.5 | O |
| 2 | vs Central Connecticut State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | vs Temple | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs San Diego State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | vs Buffalo | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | @ Eastern Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | vs Western Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | @ Sacramento State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | vs Massachusetts | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | vs Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | @ Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
1-0
100.0%
O/U Record
1-0
100.0%
Straight Up
0-1
0.0%
Home ATS0-0
Away ATS1-0
Favorite ATS0-0
Underdog ATS1-0
Last 5 ATS
W
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | +0.150 | 71th | -0.065 | 52th |
| Red Zone | +1.009 | 98th | -0.214 | 58th |
| Third Down | -0.881 | 4th | -0.071 | 48th |
| No Garbage Time | +0.150 | 66th | -0.065 | 49th |
| First Half | -0.102 | 29th | -0.044 | 42th |
| Second Half | +0.391 | 91th | -0.086 | 51th |
| Early Downs | -0.102 | 29th | -0.067 | 46th |
| Passing Downs | +0.593 | 92th | -0.135 | 56th |
| Standard Downs | -0.196 | 19th | -0.033 | 39th |
| Goal to Go | +1.009 | 94th | -0.535 | 86th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 51.2%Rush 48.8%
Havoc/Game
12.0
Havoc Rate
14.1%
TO Margin
-1.0
Explosive/G
10.0
Yards/Game
273.0
Pts/Drive
2.10
3rd Down%
12.5%
3&Out%
30.0%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Toledo vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Toledo | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 20 | 30 |
| Points / Game | 20.0 | 30.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 10 | 26 |
| Rushing | 2 | 9 |
| Passing | 6 | 14 |
| Penalty | 2 | 3 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 20 | 49 |
| Yards | 77 | 150 |
| Yards / Carry | 3.9 | 3.1 |
| Yards / Game | 77.0 | 150.0 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 21 | 34 |
| Completions | 12 | 26 |
| Completion % | 57.1% | 76.5% |
| Yards | 196 | 247 |
| Yards / Attempt | 9.3 | 7.3 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 157.45 | 147.20 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 41 | 83 |
| Yards | 273 | 397 |
| Yards / Play | 6.7 | 4.8 |
| Yards / Game | 273.0 | 397.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 3 |
| Yards | 0 | 30 |
| Average | — | 10.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 1 |
| Yards | 23 | 47 |
| Average | 23.0 | 47.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 4 | 1 |
| Yards | 184 | 44 |
| Average | 46.0 | 44.0 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 1 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 0 | 1 |
| Lost | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 7 | 4 |
| Yards | 39 | 43 |
| Yards / Game | 39.0 | 43.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 16:44 | 43:16 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 8 | 18 |
| Conversions | 1 | 6 |
| Conversion % | 12.5% | 33.3% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 3 |
| Conversions | 0 | 2 |
| Conversion % | 0.0% | 66.7% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 1 | 4 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 1 | 4 |
| Score % | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| TD % | 100.0% | 50.0% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 6 |
| Made | 0 | 5 |
| Pct | 0.0% | 83.3% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 2 | 1 |
| Made | 2 | 1 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 1 |
| Made | 0 | 1 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.