← All Teams
PITT
Pittsburgh
PanthersPass-HeavyAtlantic Coast Conference1-0#44 (+4.72)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
68· COverall
Offense
87· BRating
90· A-Per play
64· CConsistency
16· DBig plays
Defense
36· DRating
21· DPer play
82· BConsistency
Situational
28· DRed-zone O
9· FRed-zone D
97· A+3rd down O
85· B3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
+0.053
Opp-Adj Defense
-0.043
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
+0.325
Defensive EPA/play
+0.113
lower = better
Off Success Rate
56.0%
Def Success Rate
34.5%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
17.3%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
23.7%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
+0.212
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
5.00
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
-0.04
expected pts/game
Kicking
+0.06
own kicking game
Kick Defense
+0.15
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.01
own return game
Return Defense
-0.23
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Pittsburgh ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense89th
Opp-adjusted defense18th
Offensive EPA/play91th
Defensive EPA/play21th
Offensive success rate81th
Explosiveness16th
Defensive havoc34th
Points per drive84th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1Wake Forest2022OA +0.103 / -0.002similar: turnover rate, offensive EPA, pass defense3252SMU2021OA +0.036 / +0.011similar: defensive success rate, havoc rate, offensive EPA3253Minnesota2026OA +0.038 / -0.048similar: offensive EPA, run defense, TD drive rate3204Georgia Tech2024OA +0.026 / -0.008similar: offensive success rate, pass defense, defensive EPA3125Baylor2024OA +0.032 / -0.011similar: turnover rate, TD drive rate, passing offense311
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Miami (OH) | 59-14 | W | -16.5 | W | 47.5 | O |
| 2 | vs UCF | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | vs Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs Bucknell | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | vs North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | @ Miami | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | vs Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | vs Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
1-0
100.0%
O/U Record
1-0
100.0%
Straight Up
1-0
100.0%
Home ATS1-0
Away ATS0-0
Favorite ATS1-0
Underdog ATS0-0
Last 5 ATS
W
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | +0.273 | 89th | -0.017 | 40th |
| Red Zone | -0.190 | 28th | +0.819 | 9th |
| Third Down | +1.123 | 98th | -0.702 | 86th |
| No Garbage Time | +0.325 | 91th | +0.113 | 20th |
| First Half | +0.241 | 75th | +0.173 | 16th |
| Second Half | +0.308 | 85th | -0.307 | 80th |
| Early Downs | +0.183 | 77th | +0.243 | 8th |
| Passing Downs | +0.582 | 91th | -0.150 | 58th |
| Standard Downs | +0.137 | 73th | +0.115 | 18th |
| Goal to Go | +0.439 | 64th | +0.819 | 25th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 58.7%Rush 41.3%
Havoc/Game
9.0
Havoc Rate
15.3%
TO Margin
+1.0
Explosive/G
9.0
Yards/Game
646.0
Pts/Drive
5.00
3rd Down%
70.0%
3&Out%
22.2%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Pittsburgh vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Pittsburgh | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 59 | 14 |
| Points / Game | 59.0 | 14.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 33 | 14 |
| Rushing | 9 | 3 |
| Passing | 21 | 10 |
| Penalty | 3 | 1 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 31 | 21 |
| Yards | 166 | 27 |
| Yards / Carry | 5.4 | 1.3 |
| Yards / Game | 166.0 | 27.0 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 44 | 37 |
| Completions | 34 | 19 |
| Completion % | 77.3% | 51.4% |
| Yards | 480 | 262 |
| Yards / Attempt | 10.9 | 7.1 |
| Touchdowns | 7 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 221.41 | 114.35 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 75 | 58 |
| Yards | 646 | 289 |
| Yards / Play | 8.6 | 5.0 |
| Yards / Game | 646.0 | 289.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 2 | 1 |
| Yards | 15 | -2 |
| Average | 7.5 | -2.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 2 | 3 |
| Yards | 55 | 107 |
| Average | 27.5 | 35.7 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 2 | 8 |
| Yards | 106 | 335 |
| Average | 53.0 | 41.9 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 0 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 1 | 0 |
| Lost | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 5 | 9 |
| Yards | 38 | 78 |
| Yards / Game | 38.0 | 78.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 33:56 | 26:04 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 10 | 13 |
| Conversions | 7 | 3 |
| Conversion % | 70.0% | 23.1% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 1 |
| Conversions | 0 | 1 |
| Conversion % | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 4 | 1 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 2 | 1 |
| Score % | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 1 |
| TD % | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Made | 1 | 0 |
| Pct | 100.0% | — |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 8 | 2 |
| Made | 8 | 2 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Made | 0 | 0 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.