← All Teams
GT
Georgia Tech
Yellow JacketsBalancedAtlantic Coast Conference0-1#100 (-4.03)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
27· DOverall
Offense
4· FRating
16· DPer play
17· DConsistency
21· DBig plays
Defense
49· CRating
38· DPer play
56· CConsistency
Situational
5· FRed-zone O
52· CRed-zone D
19· D3rd down O
32· D3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
-0.049
Opp-Adj Defense
-0.024
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.174
Defensive EPA/play
-0.004
lower = better
Off Success Rate
40.7%
Def Success Rate
40.8%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
18.5%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
26.3%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
-0.169
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
0.67
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
+2.23
expected pts/game
Kicking
-0.38
own kicking game
Kick Defense
+0.57
vs opponent kicks
Returns
+1.96
own return game
Return Defense
+0.09
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Georgia Tech ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense16th
Opp-adjusted defense31th
Offensive EPA/play16th
Defensive EPA/play38th
Offensive success rate18th
Explosiveness21th
Defensive havoc21th
Points per drive9th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1Baylor2017OA -0.048 / -0.025similar: rushing offense, offensive success rate, takeaway rate3642Wake Forest2023OA -0.025 / +0.010similar: offensive EPA, havoc rate, pass defense3403Liberty2026OA +0.021 / +0.022similar: passing offense, takeaway rate, havoc rate3394Tennessee2018OA +0.008 / +0.019similar: rushing offense, offensive EPA, defensive EPA3235San Diego State2024OA -0.047 / -0.034similar: takeaway rate, havoc rate, offensive EPA315
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Colorado | 13-14 | L | -6.5 | L | 51.5 | U |
| 2 | vs Tennessee | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | vs Mercer | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | @ Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | vs Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | vs Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | @ Pittsburgh | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | vs Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | @ Clemson | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | vs Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
0-1
0.0%
O/U Record
0-1
0.0%
Straight Up
0-1
0.0%
Home ATS0-1
Away ATS0-0
Favorite ATS0-1
Underdog ATS0-0
Last 5 ATS
L
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.174 | 15th | -0.004 | 38th |
| Red Zone | -0.762 | 5th | -0.142 | 53th |
| Third Down | -0.319 | 19th | +0.140 | 32th |
| No Garbage Time | -0.174 | 16th | -0.004 | 39th |
| First Half | -0.301 | 8th | -0.219 | 69th |
| Second Half | -0.047 | 42th | +0.200 | 21th |
| Early Downs | -0.346 | 4th | -0.099 | 50th |
| Passing Downs | -0.043 | 41th | +0.194 | 31th |
| Standard Downs | -0.264 | 11th | -0.120 | 54th |
| Goal to Go | -0.826 | 2th | -0.711 | 92th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 44.4%Rush 55.6%
Havoc/Game
10.0
Havoc Rate
12.7%
TO Margin
-1.0
Explosive/G
10.0
Yards/Game
288.0
Pts/Drive
0.67
3rd Down%
38.5%
3&Out%
22.2%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Georgia Tech vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Georgia Tech | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 13 | 14 |
| Points / Game | 13.0 | 14.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 17 | 21 |
| Rushing | 4 | 13 |
| Passing | 10 | 7 |
| Penalty | 3 | 1 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 30 | 49 |
| Yards | 51 | 183 |
| Yards / Carry | 1.7 | 3.7 |
| Yards / Game | 51.0 | 183.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 24 | 27 |
| Completions | 17 | 14 |
| Completion % | 70.8% | 51.9% |
| Yards | 237 | 124 |
| Yards / Attempt | 9.9 | 4.6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 153.78 | 102.65 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 54 | 76 |
| Yards | 288 | 307 |
| Yards / Play | 5.3 | 4.0 |
| Yards / Game | 288.0 | 307.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 2 |
| Yards | -10 | 7 |
| Average | -10.0 | 3.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 2 | 1 |
| Yards | 130 | 12 |
| Average | 65.0 | 12.0 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 4 | 6 |
| Yards | 149 | 245 |
| Average | 37.3 | 40.8 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 0 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 3 | 1 |
| Lost | 1 | 0 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 9 | 6 |
| Yards | 49 | 60 |
| Yards / Game | 49.0 | 60.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 25:51 | 34:09 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 13 | 17 |
| Conversions | 5 | 7 |
| Conversion % | 38.5% | 41.2% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 3 |
| Conversions | 0 | 2 |
| Conversion % | — | 66.7% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 3 | 4 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 2 | 2 |
| Score % | 66.7% | 50.0% |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| TD % | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 4 | 1 |
| Made | 2 | 0 |
| Pct | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 2 |
| Made | 1 | 2 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Made | 0 | 0 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.