← All Teams
LOU
Louisville
CardinalsBalancedAtlantic Coast Conference0-1#34 (+5.54)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
75· BOverall
Offense
88· BRating
48· CPer play
27· DConsistency
38· DBig plays
Defense
40· CRating
25· DPer play
27· DConsistency
Situational
27· DRed-zone O
14· FRed-zone D
54· C3rd down O
73· B3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
+0.042
Opp-Adj Defense
-0.002
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
+0.062
Defensive EPA/play
+0.072
lower = better
Off Success Rate
42.6%
Def Success Rate
47.4%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
22.1%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
20.5%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
-0.010
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
2.85
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
+0.27
expected pts/game
Kicking
+0.32
own kicking game
Kick Defense
-0.20
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.07
own return game
Return Defense
+0.21
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Louisville ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense82th
Opp-adjusted defense50th
Offensive EPA/play49th
Defensive EPA/play25th
Offensive success rate26th
Explosiveness38th
Defensive havoc9th
Points per drive51th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1California2022OA -0.088 / -0.023similar: defensive EPA, turnover rate, pass defense3652UNLV2023OA +0.047 / -0.015similar: passing offense, defensive success rate, rushing offense3523Arkansas State2019OA +0.036 / -0.048similar: defensive EPA, passing offense, pass defense3514Coastal Carolina2024OA -0.004 / -0.025similar: run defense, offensive EPA, defensive EPA3445Florida Atlantic2022OA -0.010 / +0.001similar: turnover rate, passing offense, takeaway rate342
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ Ole Miss | 38-41 | L | +6.5 | W | 55 | O |
| 2 | vs Villanova | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | vs SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | @ NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | vs Florida State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | @ Syracuse | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | vs Stanford | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | @ Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | @ North Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | vs Pittsburgh | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | @ Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
1-0
100.0%
O/U Record
1-0
100.0%
Straight Up
0-1
0.0%
Home ATS0-0
Away ATS1-0
Favorite ATS0-0
Underdog ATS1-0
Last 5 ATS
W
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | +0.062 | 53th | +0.072 | 24th |
| Red Zone | -0.191 | 28th | +0.637 | 14th |
| Third Down | +0.157 | 55th | -0.330 | 74th |
| No Garbage Time | +0.062 | 51th | +0.072 | 24th |
| First Half | -0.504 | 4th | -0.279 | 76th |
| Second Half | +0.564 | 99th | +0.442 | 5th |
| Early Downs | +0.081 | 64th | +0.072 | 21th |
| Passing Downs | -0.165 | 27th | +0.201 | 28th |
| Standard Downs | +0.202 | 84th | +0.018 | 31th |
| Goal to Go | -0.191 | 25th | +0.343 | 54th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 42.6%Rush 57.4%
Havoc/Game
8.0
Havoc Rate
9.9%
TO Margin
+2.0
Explosive/G
15.0
Yards/Game
469.0
Pts/Drive
2.85
3rd Down%
43.8%
3&Out%
30.8%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Louisville vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Louisville | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 38 | 41 |
| Points / Game | 38.0 | 41.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 20 | 24 |
| Rushing | 10 | 12 |
| Passing | 9 | 10 |
| Penalty | 1 | 2 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 39 | 41 |
| Yards | 162 | 152 |
| Yards / Carry | 4.2 | 3.7 |
| Yards / Game | 162.0 | 152.0 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 29 | 37 |
| Completions | 18 | 21 |
| Completion % | 62.1% | 56.8% |
| Yards | 307 | 336 |
| Yards / Attempt | 10.6 | 9.1 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 173.75 | 154.39 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 68 | 78 |
| Yards | 469 | 488 |
| Yards / Play | 6.9 | 6.3 |
| Yards / Game | 469.0 | 488.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 2 |
| Yards | 3 | 7 |
| Average | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 3 | 1 |
| Yards | 51 | 9 |
| Average | 17.0 | 9.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 5 | 3 |
| Yards | 198 | 130 |
| Average | 39.6 | 43.3 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 0 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 1 | 3 |
| Lost | 0 | 1 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 9 | 6 |
| Yards | 82 | 60 |
| Yards / Game | 82.0 | 60.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 30:58 | 29:02 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 16 | 16 |
| Conversions | 7 | 6 |
| Conversion % | 43.8% | 37.5% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 2 |
| Conversions | 0 | 1 |
| Conversion % | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 2 | 2 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 2 | 2 |
| Score % | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| TD % | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 3 | 3 |
| Made | 3 | 2 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 66.7% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 3 | 5 |
| Made | 3 | 5 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Made | 1 | 0 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.