← All Teams
TA&M
Texas A&M
AggiesBalancedSoutheastern Conference1-0#26 (+6.28)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
81· BOverall
Offense
59· CRating
35· DPer play
59· CConsistency
59· CBig plays
Defense
90· A-Rating
95· APer play
88· BConsistency
Situational
63· CRed-zone O
23· D3rd down O
89· B3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
-0.017
Opp-Adj Defense
+0.099
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.024
Defensive EPA/play
-0.757
lower = better
Off Success Rate
56.5%
Def Success Rate
22.5%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
24.0%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
4.8%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
+0.733
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
3.43
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
+0.30
expected pts/game
Kicking
+0.18
own kicking game
Kick Defense
+0.12
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.09
own return game
Return Defense
+0.09
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Texas A&M ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense32th
Opp-adjusted defense99th
Offensive EPA/play35th
Defensive EPA/play96th
Offensive success rate84th
Explosiveness59th
Defensive havoc75th
Points per drive60th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1LSU2026OA -0.005 / +0.116similar: turnover rate, TD drive rate, defensive EPA4122Northwestern2017OA -0.036 / +0.113similar: takeaway rate, rushing offense, offensive EPA4073Toledo2025OA -0.058 / +0.113similar: TD drive rate, pass defense, offensive EPA3944Maryland2026OA -0.021 / +0.097similar: defensive EPA, defensive success rate, run defense3925Auburn2019OA -0.022 / +0.217similar: takeaway rate, havoc rate, offensive EPA383
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Missouri State | 50-0 | W | -40.5 | W | 53.5 | U |
| 2 | vs Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | vs Kentucky | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | @ LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | vs Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | @ Missouri | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | vs The Citadel | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | @ South Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | vs Tennessee | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | @ Oklahoma | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | vs Texas | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
1-0
100.0%
O/U Record
0-1
0.0%
Straight Up
1-0
100.0%
Home ATS1-0
Away ATS0-0
Favorite ATS1-0
Underdog ATS0-0
Last 5 ATS
W
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | +0.050 | 47th | -0.686 | 100th |
| Red Zone | +0.235 | 64th | - | 0th |
| Third Down | -0.247 | 23th | -0.772 | 90th |
| No Garbage Time | +0.027 | 42th | -0.768 | 99th |
| First Half | -0.109 | 28th | -0.757 | 97th |
| Second Half | +0.185 | 71th | -0.608 | 97th |
| Early Downs | +0.064 | 58th | -0.493 | 94th |
| Passing Downs | -0.199 | 20th | -0.909 | 100th |
| Standard Downs | +0.137 | 74th | -0.504 | 96th |
| Goal to Go | +0.716 | 82th | - | 0th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 44.7%Rush 55.3%
Havoc/Game
11.0
Havoc Rate
26.2%
TO Margin
+1.0
Explosive/G
12.0
Yards/Game
505.0
Pts/Drive
3.43
3rd Down%
50.0%
3&Out%
14.3%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Texas A&M vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Texas A&M | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 50 | 0 |
| Points / Game | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 35 | 4 |
| Rushing | 17 | 2 |
| Passing | 16 | 1 |
| Penalty | 2 | 1 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 47 | 23 |
| Yards | 236 | 37 |
| Yards / Carry | 5.0 | 1.6 |
| Yards / Game | 236.0 | 37.0 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 38 | 17 |
| Completions | 25 | 8 |
| Completion % | 65.8% | 47.1% |
| Yards | 269 | 30 |
| Yards / Attempt | 7.1 | 1.8 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 151.31 | 61.88 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 85 | 40 |
| Yards | 505 | 67 |
| Yards / Play | 5.9 | 1.7 |
| Yards / Game | 505.0 | 67.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 4 | 1 |
| Yards | 38 | -6 |
| Average | 9.5 | -6.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 2 |
| Yards | 17 | 36 |
| Average | 17.0 | 18.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 2 | 7 |
| Yards | 84 | 285 |
| Average | 42.0 | 40.7 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 0 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 2 | 3 |
| Lost | 1 | 2 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 8 | 8 |
| Yards | 75 | 41 |
| Yards / Game | 75.0 | 41.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 43:03 | 16:57 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 14 | 10 |
| Conversions | 7 | 1 |
| Conversion % | 50.0% | 10.0% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 2 | 2 |
| Conversions | 2 | 1 |
| Conversion % | 100.0% | 50.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 8 | 0 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 7 | 0 |
| Score % | 87.5% | — |
| Touchdowns | 6 | 0 |
| TD % | 75.0% | — |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 2 | 0 |
| Made | 2 | 0 |
| Pct | 100.0% | — |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 6 | 0 |
| Made | 6 | 0 |
| Pct | 100.0% | — |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Made | 0 | 0 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.