← All Teams
AUB
Auburn
TigersBalancedSoutheastern Conference1-0#105 (-4.76)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
24· DOverall
Offense
10· FRating
29· DPer play
38· DConsistency
10· FBig plays
Defense
53· CRating
50· CPer play
20· DConsistency
Situational
89· BRed-zone O
58· CRed-zone D
56· C3rd down O
63· C3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
-0.027
Opp-Adj Defense
-0.006
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.051
Defensive EPA/play
-0.066
lower = better
Off Success Rate
44.7%
Def Success Rate
49.5%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
15.8%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
17.2%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
+0.015
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
1.31
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
-0.25
expected pts/game
Kicking
-0.04
own kicking game
Kick Defense
-0.12
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.12
own return game
Return Defense
+0.04
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Auburn ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense26th
Opp-adjusted defense47th
Offensive EPA/play29th
Defensive EPA/play50th
Offensive success rate35th
Explosiveness10th
Defensive havoc50th
Points per drive20th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1Maryland2024OA -0.026 / -0.007similar: rushing offense, offensive EPA, run defense4042Temple2020OA -0.032 / -0.019similar: offensive success rate, rushing offense, turnover rate3783Middle Tennessee2023OA -0.089 / -0.016similar: defensive EPA, havoc rate, pass defense3534Louisiana Tech2021OA -0.043 / -0.064similar: defensive success rate, pass defense, offensive EPA3435Rutgers2020OA -0.045 / -0.014similar: havoc rate, pass defense, TD drive rate339
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Baylor | 17-16 | W | -7.5 | L | 58.5 | U |
| 2 | vs Southern Miss | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | vs Florida | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs Vanderbilt | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | @ Tennessee | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | @ Georgia | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | vs LSU | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | @ Ole Miss | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | vs Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | @ Mississippi State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | vs Samford | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | @ Alabama | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
0-1
0.0%
O/U Record
0-1
0.0%
Straight Up
1-0
100.0%
Home ATS0-1
Away ATS0-0
Favorite ATS0-1
Underdog ATS0-0
Last 5 ATS
L
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.051 | 29th | -0.066 | 53th |
| Red Zone | +0.623 | 90th | -0.242 | 59th |
| Third Down | +0.181 | 57th | -0.217 | 64th |
| No Garbage Time | -0.051 | 29th | -0.066 | 50th |
| First Half | -0.009 | 42th | +0.007 | 36th |
| Second Half | -0.097 | 34th | -0.135 | 58th |
| Early Downs | -0.052 | 34th | -0.104 | 53th |
| Passing Downs | -0.236 | 18th | +0.394 | 15th |
| Standard Downs | +0.057 | 53th | -0.286 | 77th |
| Goal to Go | - | 0th | -0.265 | 72th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 46.1%Rush 53.9%
Havoc/Game
20.0
Havoc Rate
19.2%
TO Margin
-1.0
Explosive/G
12.0
Yards/Game
389.0
Pts/Drive
1.31
3rd Down%
55.6%
3&Out%
15.4%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Auburn vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Auburn | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 17 | 16 |
| Points / Game | 17.0 | 16.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 24 | 27 |
| Rushing | 9 | 7 |
| Passing | 14 | 17 |
| Penalty | 1 | 3 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 41 | 45 |
| Yards | 130 | 103 |
| Yards / Carry | 3.2 | 2.3 |
| Yards / Game | 130.0 | 103.0 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 35 | 54 |
| Completions | 26 | 27 |
| Completion % | 74.3% | 50.0% |
| Yards | 259 | 333 |
| Yards / Attempt | 7.4 | 6.2 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 3 | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 119.30 | 110.32 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 76 | 99 |
| Yards | 389 | 436 |
| Yards / Play | 5.1 | 4.4 |
| Yards / Game | 389.0 | 436.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 1 |
| Yards | 2 | -3 |
| Average | 2.0 | -3.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 0 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Average | — | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 4 | 4 |
| Yards | 170 | 208 |
| Average | 42.5 | 52.0 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 3 |
| Yards | 6 | 10 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 0 | 2 |
| Lost | 0 | 1 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 6 | 5 |
| Yards | 47 | 40 |
| Yards / Game | 47.0 | 40.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 27:28 | 32:32 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 18 | 22 |
| Conversions | 10 | 7 |
| Conversion % | 55.6% | 31.8% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 6 |
| Conversions | 0 | 4 |
| Conversion % | 0.0% | 66.7% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 3 | 4 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 2 | 3 |
| Score % | 66.7% | 75.0% |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| TD % | 66.7% | 50.0% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 2 | 2 |
| Made | 1 | 1 |
| Pct | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 2 | 1 |
| Made | 2 | 1 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Made | 0 | 0 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.