← All Teams
UTAH
Utah
UtesRun-HeavyBig 12 Conference1-0#68 (+1.08)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
51· COverall
Offense
68· CRating
82· BPer play
77· BConsistency
85· BBig plays
Defense
38· DRating
64· CPer play
72· BConsistency
Situational
59· CRed-zone O
0· FRed-zone D
89· B3rd down O
54· C3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
+0.030
Opp-Adj Defense
-0.011
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
+0.275
Defensive EPA/play
-0.204
lower = better
Off Success Rate
58.7%
Def Success Rate
36.1%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
29.5%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
0.0%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
+0.479
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
4.75
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
-0.33
expected pts/game
Kicking
+0.12
own kicking game
Kick Defense
-0.38
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.07
own return game
Return Defense
-0.00
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Utah ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense72th
Opp-adjusted defense43th
Offensive EPA/play83th
Defensive EPA/play65th
Offensive success rate88th
Explosiveness86th
Defensive havoc25th
Points per drive82th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1Iowa State2024OA +0.039 / +0.005similar: offensive EPA, rushing offense, run defense3882Buffalo2018OA +0.077 / -0.060similar: defensive success rate, rushing offense, offensive EPA3643Minnesota2019OA +0.177 / +0.011similar: pass defense, offensive EPA, defensive EPA3424Ball State2019OA +0.005 / -0.021similar: havoc rate, turnover rate, passing offense3405Kansas State2022OA +0.082 / +0.085similar: pass defense, defensive success rate, TD drive rate335
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Idaho | 66-14 | W | -35.0 | W | 57.5 | O |
| 2 | vs Arkansas | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | vs Utah State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | vs Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | @ Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | vs Houston | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | @ Cincinnati | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | vs BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | @ Arizona | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | @ TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | vs West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
1-0
100.0%
O/U Record
1-0
100.0%
Straight Up
1-0
100.0%
Home ATS1-0
Away ATS0-0
Favorite ATS1-0
Underdog ATS0-0
Last 5 ATS
W
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | +0.337 | 93th | -0.080 | 53th |
| Red Zone | +0.180 | 60th | +1.813 | 0th |
| Third Down | +0.872 | 90th | -0.149 | 55th |
| No Garbage Time | +0.275 | 84th | -0.204 | 66th |
| First Half | +0.246 | 77th | -0.204 | 66th |
| Second Half | +0.427 | 93th | +0.076 | 34th |
| Early Downs | +0.246 | 87th | -0.154 | 60th |
| Passing Downs | +1.027 | 99th | +0.036 | 39th |
| Standard Downs | +0.150 | 76th | -0.172 | 61th |
| Goal to Go | -0.039 | 30th | +1.674 | 9th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 34.7%Rush 65.3%
Havoc/Game
8.0
Havoc Rate
13.1%
TO Margin
+2.0
Explosive/G
13.0
Yards/Game
633.0
Pts/Drive
4.75
3rd Down%
66.7%
3&Out%
0.0%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Utah vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Utah | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 66 | 14 |
| Points / Game | 66.0 | 14.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 33 | 13 |
| Rushing | 17 | 7 |
| Passing | 15 | 6 |
| Penalty | 1 | 0 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 49 | 31 |
| Yards | 364 | 106 |
| Yards / Carry | 7.4 | 3.4 |
| Yards / Game | 364.0 | 106.0 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 2 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 26 | 30 |
| Completions | 17 | 11 |
| Completion % | 65.4% | 36.7% |
| Yards | 269 | 119 |
| Yards / Attempt | 10.3 | 4.0 |
| Touchdowns | 5 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 215.75 | 63.32 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 75 | 61 |
| Yards | 633 | 225 |
| Yards / Play | 8.4 | 3.7 |
| Yards / Game | 633.0 | 225.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 2 | 0 |
| Yards | 33 | 0 |
| Average | 16.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 1 |
| Yards | 0 | 17 |
| Average | — | 17.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 1 | 7 |
| Yards | 47 | 324 |
| Average | 47.0 | 46.3 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 0 |
| Yards | 2 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 1 | 1 |
| Lost | 0 | 1 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 1 | 5 |
| Yards | 10 | 35 |
| Yards / Game | 10.0 | 35.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 34:20 | 25:40 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 12 | 13 |
| Conversions | 8 | 3 |
| Conversion % | 66.7% | 23.1% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 2 | 2 |
| Conversions | 1 | 1 |
| Conversion % | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 9 | 1 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 8 | 1 |
| Score % | 88.9% | 100.0% |
| Touchdowns | 7 | 1 |
| TD % | 77.8% | 100.0% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Made | 1 | 0 |
| Pct | 100.0% | — |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 9 | 2 |
| Made | 9 | 2 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Made | 0 | 0 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.