← All Teams
STAN
Stanford
CardinalBalancedAtlantic Coast Conference1-1#136 (-18.87)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
1· FOverall
Offense
7· FRating
33· DPer play
23· DConsistency
55· CBig plays
Defense
1· FRating
14· FPer play
25· DConsistency
Situational
43· CRed-zone O
15· DRed-zone D
27· D3rd down O
17· D3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
-0.036
Opp-Adj Defense
-0.136
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.031
Defensive EPA/play
+0.171
lower = better
Off Success Rate
41.6%
Def Success Rate
47.9%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
23.6%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
27.7%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
-0.202
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
-0.006
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
1.70
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
+0.19
expected pts/game
Kicking
+0.07
own kicking game
Kick Defense
-0.07
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.33
own return game
Return Defense
+0.51
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Stanford ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense19th
Opp-adjusted defense1th
Offensive EPA/play33th
Defensive EPA/play15th
Offensive success rate24th
Explosiveness55th
Defensive havoc26th
Points per drive29th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1UConn2023OA -0.119 / -0.056similar: run defense, havoc rate, turnover rate4482Georgia Tech2021OA +0.003 / -0.081similar: defensive success rate, defensive EPA, rushing offense4243California2022OA -0.088 / -0.023similar: TD drive rate, rushing offense, offensive success rate4034Middle Tennessee2025OA -0.065 / -0.153similar: turnover rate, takeaway rate, TD drive rate3715Temple2021OA -0.129 / -0.034similar: havoc rate, turnover rate, takeaway rate366
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | vs Hawai'i | 37-27 | W | -4.0 | W | 48.5 | O |
| 1 | vs Miami | 6-45 | L | +23.5 | L | 47.5 | O |
| 3 | @ Duke | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs Georgia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | @ Wake Forest | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | @ Notre Dame | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | vs Elon | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | vs NC State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | @ Louisville | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | @ Virginia Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | @ California | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | vs SMU | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
1-1
50.0%
O/U Record
2-0
100.0%
Straight Up
1-1
50.0%
Home ATS1-1
Away ATS0-0
Favorite ATS1-0
Underdog ATS0-1
Last 5 ATS
WL
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.074 | 26th | +0.149 | 14th |
| Red Zone | -0.022 | 43th | +0.610 | 15th |
| Third Down | -0.199 | 28th | +0.457 | 17th |
| No Garbage Time | -0.031 | 33th | +0.171 | 13th |
| First Half | -0.092 | 31th | +0.150 | 18th |
| Second Half | -0.053 | 39th | +0.149 | 28th |
| Early Downs | +0.104 | 68th | +0.025 | 30th |
| Passing Downs | -0.322 | 15th | +0.048 | 36th |
| Standard Downs | +0.065 | 55th | +0.212 | 9th |
| Goal to Go | -0.234 | 23th | +0.671 | 30th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 55.5%Rush 44.5%
Havoc/Game
9.5
Havoc Rate
13.2%
TO Margin
+1.0
Explosive/G
12.5
Yards/Game
383.5
Pts/Drive
1.70
3rd Down%
38.7%
3&Out%
35.0%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 2 games — Stanford vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Stanford | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 43 | 72 |
| Points / Game | 21.5 | 36.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 38 | 46 |
| Rushing | 12 | 13 |
| Passing | 23 | 31 |
| Penalty | 3 | 2 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 61 | 54 |
| Yards | 236 | 167 |
| Yards / Carry | 3.9 | 3.1 |
| Yards / Game | 118.0 | 83.5 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 3 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 76 | 88 |
| Completions | 44 | 62 |
| Completion % | 57.9% | 70.5% |
| Yards | 531 | 707 |
| Yards / Attempt | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 7 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 120.93 | 161.92 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 137 | 142 |
| Yards | 767 | 874 |
| Yards / Play | 5.6 | 6.2 |
| Yards / Game | 383.5 | 437.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 4 | 3 |
| Yards | 8 | 12 |
| Average | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 8 | 2 |
| Yards | 158 | 45 |
| Average | 19.8 | 22.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 13 | 10 |
| Yards | 570 | 390 |
| Average | 43.8 | 39.0 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 0 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 0 | 3 |
| Lost | 0 | 1 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 17 | 12 |
| Yards | 129 | 81 |
| Yards / Game | 64.5 | 40.5 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 29:15 | 30:45 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 31 | 30 |
| Conversions | 12 | 16 |
| Conversion % | 38.7% | 53.3% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 4 | 2 |
| Conversions | 1 | 2 |
| Conversion % | 25.0% | 100.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 8 | 6 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 6 | 6 |
| Score % | 75.0% | 100.0% |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 6 |
| TD % | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 3 | 1 |
| Made | 2 | 1 |
| Pct | 66.7% | 100.0% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 5 | 8 |
| Made | 5 | 7 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 87.5% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 2 |
| Made | 0 | 1 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.