← All Teams
CIN
Cincinnati
BearcatsRun-HeavyBig 12 Conference1-0#52 (+3.68)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
62· COverall
Offense
45· CRating
53· CPer play
62· CConsistency
66· CBig plays
Defense
71· BRating
51· CPer play
39· DConsistency
Situational
84· BRed-zone O
70· BRed-zone D
40· C3rd down O
25· D3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
+0.005
Opp-Adj Defense
+0.002
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
+0.089
Defensive EPA/play
-0.092
lower = better
Off Success Rate
52.5%
Def Success Rate
46.6%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
24.6%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
27.1%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
+0.181
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
2.83
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
+1.01
expected pts/game
Kicking
+0.46
own kicking game
Kick Defense
+0.48
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.11
own return game
Return Defense
+0.19
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Cincinnati ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense51th
Opp-adjusted defense53th
Offensive EPA/play54th
Defensive EPA/play51th
Offensive success rate69th
Explosiveness67th
Defensive havoc79th
Points per drive50th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1Arizona State2018OA +0.072 / -0.049similar: offensive success rate, rushing offense, turnover rate3442Pittsburgh2018OA +0.031 / +0.003similar: offensive EPA, turnover rate, TD drive rate3443Jacksonville State2025OA -0.063 / -0.020similar: offensive EPA, pass defense, rushing offense3434UAB2017OA -0.060 / -0.004similar: turnover rate, offensive EPA, TD drive rate3315UTSA2020OA -0.013 / -0.000similar: offensive EPA, defensive EPA, TD drive rate316
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Boston College | 34-15 | W | -7.0 | W | 51.5 | U |
| 2 | vs Western Carolina | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | vs Miami (OH) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs Kansas State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | @ Arizona | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | @ West Virginia | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | vs Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | vs Utah | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | @ Houston | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | @ Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | vs Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
1-0
100.0%
O/U Record
0-1
0.0%
Straight Up
1-0
100.0%
Home ATS1-0
Away ATS0-0
Favorite ATS1-0
Underdog ATS0-0
Last 5 ATS
W
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | +0.089 | 61th | -0.006 | 39th |
| Red Zone | +0.549 | 85th | -0.442 | 71th |
| Third Down | -0.031 | 40th | +0.240 | 26th |
| No Garbage Time | +0.089 | 56th | -0.092 | 51th |
| First Half | -0.010 | 41th | -0.124 | 52th |
| Second Half | +0.168 | 69th | +0.097 | 30th |
| Early Downs | +0.168 | 75th | +0.079 | 20th |
| Passing Downs | +0.005 | 45th | -0.146 | 57th |
| Standard Downs | +0.136 | 72th | +0.082 | 22th |
| Goal to Go | +0.505 | 66th | -0.810 | 95th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 24.6%Rush 75.4%
Havoc/Game
-
Havoc Rate
27.0%
TO Margin
-
Explosive/G
-
Yards/Game
-
Pts/Drive
2.83
3rd Down%
-
3&Out%
25.0%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Cincinnati vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Cincinnati | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 34 | 15 |
| Points / Game | 34.0 | 15.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 17 | 24 |
| Rushing | 11 | 11 |
| Passing | 5 | 10 |
| Penalty | 1 | 3 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 46 | 38 |
| Yards | 254 | 165 |
| Yards / Carry | 5.5 | 4.3 |
| Yards / Game | 254.0 | 165.0 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 1 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 15 | 35 |
| Completions | 11 | 18 |
| Completion % | 73.3% | 51.4% |
| Yards | 85 | 223 |
| Yards / Attempt | 5.7 | 6.4 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 142.93 | 108.66 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 61 | 73 |
| Yards | 339 | 388 |
| Yards / Play | 5.6 | 5.3 |
| Yards / Game | 339.0 | 388.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 2 | 2 |
| Yards | 12 | 4 |
| Average | 6.0 | 2.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 2 |
| Yards | 0 | 18 |
| Average | — | 9.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 4 | 4 |
| Yards | 209 | 178 |
| Average | 52.3 | 44.5 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 0 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 3 | 3 |
| Lost | 0 | 1 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 7 | 7 |
| Yards | 69 | 37 |
| Yards / Game | 69.0 | 37.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 28:41 | 31:19 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 12 | 13 |
| Conversions | 5 | 4 |
| Conversion % | 41.7% | 30.8% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 4 |
| Conversions | 1 | 1 |
| Conversion % | 100.0% | 25.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 4 | 3 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 4 | 1 |
| Score % | 100.0% | 33.3% |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 1 |
| TD % | 100.0% | 33.3% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 2 | 1 |
| Made | 2 | 0 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 4 | 1 |
| Made | 4 | 1 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Made | 0 | 1 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.