← All Teams
BAY
Baylor
BearsBalancedBig 12 Conference0-1#43 (+4.76)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
69· COverall
Offense
42· CRating
27· DPer play
54· CConsistency
14· FBig plays
Defense
94· ARating
48· CPer play
35· DConsistency
Situational
24· DRed-zone O
14· FRed-zone D
26· D3rd down O
28· D3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
+0.006
Opp-Adj Defense
+0.027
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.066
Defensive EPA/play
-0.051
lower = better
Off Success Rate
49.5%
Def Success Rate
44.7%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
17.2%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
15.8%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
-0.015
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
1.31
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
+0.25
expected pts/game
Kicking
+0.12
own kicking game
Kick Defense
+0.04
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.04
own return game
Return Defense
+0.12
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Baylor ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense52th
Opp-adjusted defense67th
Offensive EPA/play27th
Defensive EPA/play49th
Offensive success rate55th
Explosiveness14th
Defensive havoc84th
Points per drive20th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1San José State2024OA -0.005 / +0.004similar: offensive success rate, passing offense, takeaway rate3542Louisiana Tech2018OA -0.004 / +0.003similar: havoc rate, takeaway rate, turnover rate3433Temple2020OA -0.032 / -0.019similar: defensive success rate, rushing offense, offensive EPA3404Miami2022OA -0.012 / -0.007similar: takeaway rate, rushing offense, offensive EPA3365Troy2021OA -0.126 / -0.004similar: takeaway rate, TD drive rate, run defense322
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ Auburn | 16-17 | L | +7.5 | W | 58.5 | U |
| 2 | vs Prairie View A&M | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | vs Louisiana Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs Colorado | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | @ Arizona State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | vs TCU | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | @ Kansas | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | @ UCF | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | vs Iowa State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | @ BYU | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | vs Texas Tech | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | @ Houston | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
1-0
100.0%
O/U Record
0-1
0.0%
Straight Up
0-1
0.0%
Home ATS0-0
Away ATS1-0
Favorite ATS0-0
Underdog ATS1-0
Last 5 ATS
W
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.066 | 27th | -0.051 | 50th |
| Red Zone | -0.242 | 24th | +0.623 | 15th |
| Third Down | -0.217 | 26th | +0.181 | 28th |
| No Garbage Time | -0.066 | 27th | -0.051 | 48th |
| First Half | +0.007 | 43th | -0.009 | 39th |
| Second Half | -0.135 | 28th | -0.097 | 53th |
| Early Downs | -0.104 | 28th | -0.052 | 45th |
| Passing Downs | +0.394 | 78th | -0.236 | 72th |
| Standard Downs | -0.286 | 9th | +0.057 | 29th |
| Goal to Go | -0.265 | 22th | - | 0th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 54.5%Rush 45.5%
Havoc/Game
23.0
Havoc Rate
29.9%
TO Margin
+1.0
Explosive/G
17.0
Yards/Game
436.0
Pts/Drive
1.31
3rd Down%
31.8%
3&Out%
23.1%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Baylor vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Baylor | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 16 | 17 |
| Points / Game | 16.0 | 17.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 27 | 24 |
| Rushing | 7 | 9 |
| Passing | 17 | 14 |
| Penalty | 3 | 1 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 45 | 41 |
| Yards | 103 | 130 |
| Yards / Carry | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Yards / Game | 103.0 | 130.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 54 | 35 |
| Completions | 27 | 26 |
| Completion % | 50.0% | 74.3% |
| Yards | 333 | 259 |
| Yards / Attempt | 6.2 | 7.4 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 3 |
| Passer Rating | 110.32 | 119.30 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 99 | 76 |
| Yards | 436 | 389 |
| Yards / Play | 4.4 | 5.1 |
| Yards / Game | 436.0 | 389.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 1 | 1 |
| Yards | -3 | 2 |
| Average | -3.0 | 2.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 0 |
| Yards | 0 | 0 |
| Average | — | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 4 | 4 |
| Yards | 208 | 170 |
| Average | 52.0 | 42.5 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 3 | 1 |
| Yards | 10 | 6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 2 | 0 |
| Lost | 1 | 0 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 5 | 6 |
| Yards | 40 | 47 |
| Yards / Game | 40.0 | 47.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 32:32 | 27:28 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 22 | 18 |
| Conversions | 7 | 10 |
| Conversion % | 31.8% | 55.6% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 6 | 1 |
| Conversions | 4 | 0 |
| Conversion % | 66.7% | 0.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 4 | 3 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 3 | 2 |
| Score % | 75.0% | 66.7% |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| TD % | 50.0% | 66.7% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 2 | 2 |
| Made | 1 | 1 |
| Pct | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 2 |
| Made | 1 | 2 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 1 | 0 |
| Made | 0 | 0 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.