← All Teams
SAC
Sacramento State
HornetsBalancedMid-American1-4#122 (-4.54)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
12· FOverall
Offense
1· FRating
1· FPer play
34· DConsistency
3· FBig plays
Defense
20· DRating
32· DPer play
48· CConsistency
Situational
5· FRed-zone O
34· DRed-zone D
7· F3rd down O
66· C3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
-0.055
Opp-Adj Defense
-0.010
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.312
Defensive EPA/play
+0.031
lower = better
Off Success Rate
46.9%
Def Success Rate
43.4%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
18.3%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
24.4%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
-0.343
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
-0.026
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
1.16
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
+1.03
expected pts/game
Kicking
-0.02
own kicking game
Kick Defense
+1.04
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.06
own return game
Return Defense
+0.08
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Sacramento State ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense0th
Opp-adjusted defense28th
Offensive EPA/play1th
Defensive EPA/play32th
Offensive success rate44th
Explosiveness3th
Defensive havoc12th
Points per drive1th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1Indiana2021OA -0.067 / -0.003similar: passing offense, takeaway rate, turnover rate3922Virginia2024OA -0.035 / -0.006similar: havoc rate, pass defense, run defense3843Kansas2017OA -0.077 / -0.050similar: takeaway rate, rushing offense, TD drive rate3634Texas State2017OA -0.190 / -0.057similar: takeaway rate, run defense, rushing offense3575Michigan State2023OA -0.078 / -0.038similar: rushing offense, passing offense, offensive EPA353
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | @ Eastern Michigan | 17-28 | L | +9.0 | L | 53.5 | U |
| 1 | vs Mississippi Valley State | 52-0 | W | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | @ Fresno State | 3-49 | L | +17.5 | L | 44.5 | O |
| 3 | vs North Dakota State | 10-31 | L | +26.5 | W | 50.5 | U |
| 4 | vs Massachusetts | 6-35 | L | +4.5 | L | 49 | U |
| 6 | @ Bowling Green | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | vs Ohio | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | @ Ball State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | vs Kent State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | vs Toledo | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | @ Central Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | @ Hawai'i | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
1-3
25.0%
O/U Record
1-3
25.0%
Straight Up
1-4
20.0%
Home ATS1-1
Away ATS0-2
Favorite ATS0-0
Underdog ATS1-3
Last 5 ATS
LLWL
Graded against pre-game consensus lines. Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently at sources that use a different line.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.192 | 1th | -0.022 | 45th |
| Red Zone | -0.516 | 5th | +0.070 | 34th |
| Third Down | -0.329 | 7th | -0.119 | 66th |
| No Garbage Time | -0.318 | 0th | +0.027 | 31th |
| First Half | -0.376 | 1th | +0.046 | 25th |
| Second Half | -0.011 | 42th | -0.126 | 77th |
| Early Downs | -0.130 | 12th | +0.102 | 10th |
| Passing Downs | -0.341 | 1th | -0.075 | 64th |
| Standard Downs | -0.117 | 10th | +0.009 | 31th |
| Goal to Go | -0.147 | 27th | +0.116 | 46th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 55.4%Rush 44.6%
Havoc/Game
8.4
Havoc Rate
13.9%
TO Margin
-1.8
Explosive/G
8.0
Yards/Game
327.4
Pts/Drive
1.16
3rd Down%
36.6%
3&Out%
27.9%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 5 games — Sacramento State vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Sacramento State | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 88 | 143 |
| Points / Game | 17.6 | 28.6 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 97 | 85 |
| Rushing | 41 | 30 |
| Passing | 47 | 43 |
| Penalty | 9 | 12 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 152 | 168 |
| Yards | 556 | 750 |
| Yards / Carry | 3.7 | 4.5 |
| Yards / Game | 111.2 | 150.0 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 11 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 189 | 128 |
| Completions | 108 | 87 |
| Completion % | 57.1% | 68.0% |
| Yards | 1,081 | 982 |
| Yards / Attempt | 5.7 | 7.7 |
| Touchdowns | 5 | 6 |
| Interceptions | 6 | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 107.57 | 147.88 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 341 | 296 |
| Yards | 1,637 | 1,732 |
| Yards / Play | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Yards / Game | 327.4 | 346.4 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 6 | 3 |
| Yards | 56 | 6 |
| Average | 9.3 | 2.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 5 | 9 |
| Yards | 86 | 112 |
| Average | 17.2 | 12.4 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 24 | 27 |
| Yards | 973 | 892 |
| Average | 40.5 | 33.0 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 6 |
| Yards | 0 | 79 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 7 | 5 |
| Lost | 5 | 2 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 35 | 31 |
| Yards | 325 | 291 |
| Yards / Game | 65.0 | 58.2 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 30:10 | 29:50 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 71 | 60 |
| Conversions | 26 | 20 |
| Conversion % | 36.6% | 33.3% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 10 | 5 |
| Conversions | 4 | 0 |
| Conversion % | 40.0% | 0.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 15 | 14 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 11 | 12 |
| Score % | 73.3% | 85.7% |
| Touchdowns | 5 | 10 |
| TD % | 33.3% | 71.4% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 8 | 6 |
| Made | 6 | 3 |
| Pct | 75.0% | 50.0% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 10 | 18 |
| Made | 10 | 18 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 1 |
| Made | 0 | 1 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.