← All Teams
RUTG
Rutgers
Scarlet KnightsPass-HeavyBig Ten Conference0-1#133 (-12.92)
Early-season ratings are provisional. Opponent adjustment relies on a thin schedule graph until teams are connected through more games; expect movement through late September.
Grades
Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.
4· FOverall
Offense
6· FRating
4· FPer play
7· FConsistency
47· CBig plays
Defense
9· FRating
17· DPer play
17· DConsistency
Situational
29· DRed-zone O
43· CRed-zone D
29· D3rd down O
56· C3rd down D
Analytical Fingerprint
SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.
Opp-Adj Offense
-0.094
Opp-Adj Defense
-0.063
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.412
Defensive EPA/play
+0.141
lower = better
Off Success Rate
38.1%
Def Success Rate
50.8%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
22.9%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
22.2%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
-0.552
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
0.000
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
0.78
Special Teams
Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.
Net ST Rating
-0.65
expected pts/game
Kicking
-0.16
own kicking game
Kick Defense
-0.49
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.04
own return game
Return Defense
+0.05
vs opponent returns
Peer Context
Where Rutgers ranks among all FBS teams in 2026 (percentile).
Opp-adjusted offense3th
Opp-adjusted defense10th
Offensive EPA/play4th
Defensive EPA/play18th
Offensive success rate14th
Explosiveness47th
Defensive havoc1th
Points per drive10th
Historical Fingerprint
Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.
1NC State2026OA -0.050 / -0.006similar: defensive success rate, TD drive rate, offensive EPA4072UNLV2021OA -0.090 / -0.053similar: TD drive rate, rushing offense, offensive EPA3823Florida International2023OA -0.096 / -0.084similar: rushing offense, TD drive rate, offensive success rate3744Vanderbilt2020OA -0.024 / -0.050similar: run defense, TD drive rate, pass defense3695Boston College2025OA -0.019 / -0.094similar: rushing offense, defensive success rate, havoc rate361
2026 Schedule & Results
12 games
| Wk | Opponent | Score | W/L | Spread | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs Massachusetts | 21-37 | L | -29.0 | L | 52.5 | O |
| 2 | @ Boston College | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | vs USC | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | vs Howard | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | vs Indiana | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | @ Maryland | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | @ Northwestern | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 9 | vs Michigan | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | @ Wisconsin | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 11 | vs Nebraska | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | @ Penn State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 13 | vs Michigan State | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Betting Profile
ATS Record
0-1
0.0%
O/U Record
1-0
100.0%
Straight Up
0-1
0.0%
Home ATS0-1
Away ATS0-0
Favorite ATS0-1
Underdog ATS0-0
Last 5 ATS
L
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.
Situational Profile
Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.
| Situation | OFF EPA | OFF Rank | DEF EPA | DEF Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.124 | 22th | +0.141 | 15th |
| Red Zone | -0.166 | 29th | -0.010 | 43th |
| Third Down | -0.187 | 29th | -0.154 | 56th |
| No Garbage Time | -0.412 | 4th | +0.141 | 18th |
| First Half | -0.247 | 12th | +0.465 | 1th |
| Second Half | -0.038 | 43th | -0.239 | 72th |
| Early Downs | -0.719 | 0th | +0.321 | 5th |
| Passing Downs | +0.363 | 74th | -0.159 | 60th |
| Standard Downs | -0.386 | 4th | +0.270 | 6th |
| Goal to Go | +0.569 | 74th | -0.428 | 83th |
Style & Tendencies
Pass 60.3%Rush 39.7%
Havoc/Game
4.0
Havoc Rate
5.9%
TO Margin
-4.0
Explosive/G
11.0
Yards/Game
346.0
Pts/Drive
0.78
3rd Down%
27.3%
3&Out%
22.2%
Team Statistics
2026 season totals across 1 games — Rutgers vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
| Stat | Rutgers | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| Points | 21 | 37 |
| Points / Game | 21.0 | 37.0 |
| First Downs | ||
| Total | 18 | 21 |
| Rushing | 5 | 13 |
| Passing | 12 | 8 |
| Penalty | 1 | 0 |
| Rushing | ||
| Attempts | 25 | 41 |
| Yards | 27 | 200 |
| Yards / Carry | 1.1 | 4.9 |
| Yards / Game | 27.0 | 200.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Passing | ||
| Attempts | 38 | 22 |
| Completions | 22 | 19 |
| Completion % | 57.9% | 86.4% |
| Yards | 319 | 197 |
| Yards / Attempt | 8.4 | 9.0 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 3 | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 138.67 | 206.58 |
| Total Offense | ||
| Plays | 63 | 63 |
| Yards | 346 | 397 |
| Yards / Play | 5.5 | 6.3 |
| Yards / Game | 346.0 | 397.0 |
| Punt Returns | ||
| Returns | 2 | 0 |
| Yards | 24 | 0 |
| Average | 12.0 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Kickoff Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 1 |
| Yards | 0 | 8 |
| Average | — | 8.0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Punting | ||
| Punts | 3 | 3 |
| Yards | 130 | 172 |
| Average | 43.3 | 57.3 |
| Interception Returns | ||
| Returns | 0 | 3 |
| Yards | 0 | 12 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles | ||
| Fumbles | 1 | 1 |
| Lost | 1 | 0 |
| Penalties | ||
| Penalties | 7 | 8 |
| Yards | 34 | 60 |
| Yards / Game | 34.0 | 60.0 |
| Time of Possession | ||
| Per Game | 23:39 | 36:21 |
| Third Downs | ||
| Attempts | 11 | 11 |
| Conversions | 3 | 4 |
| Conversion % | 27.3% | 36.4% |
| Fourth Downs | ||
| Attempts | 5 | 1 |
| Conversions | 4 | 1 |
| Conversion % | 80.0% | 100.0% |
| Red Zone | ||
| Trips | 3 | 4 |
| Scores (TD + FG) | 2 | 4 |
| Score % | 66.7% | 100.0% |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| TD % | 66.7% | 50.0% |
| Field Goals | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 3 |
| Made | 0 | 3 |
| Pct | — | 100.0% |
| PAT Kicking | ||
| Attempts | 3 | 4 |
| Made | 3 | 4 |
| Pct | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Two-Point Conversions | ||
| Attempts | 0 | 0 |
| Made | 0 | 0 |
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.