Fourth Down Data
← All Teams
USM

Southern Miss

Golden EaglesBalanced
Sun Belt Conference3-7#100 (-4.85)

Grades

Percentile grades against every FBS team this season — 99 is best. Curved so an average team reads C, not F.

22· DOverall
Offense
30· DRating
36· DPer play
24· DConsistency
65· CBig plays
Defense
10· FRating
22· DPer play
36· DConsistency
Situational
46· CRed-zone O
12· FRed-zone D
39· D3rd down O
17· D3rd down D
How grades work →

Analytical Fingerprint

SS-native team profile — opponent-adjusted and garbage-filtered EPA, success, and explosiveness.

Opp-Adj Offense
-0.014
Opp-Adj Defense
-0.036
higher = better
Offensive EPA/play
-0.027
Defensive EPA/play
+0.104
lower = better
Off Success Rate
45.3%
Def Success Rate
49.1%
allowed · lower = better
Explosive Rate
25.4%
pass EPA > 1.0 · rush > 0.8
Explosive Allowed
25.8%
lower = better
Net EPA/play
-0.131
net · higher = better
Recent EPA Trend
-0.019
last 3 weeks
Points / Drive
2.07

Special Teams

Opponent-adjusted special-teams component of the Final Rating, in expected points per game — positive = better. The four units sum to the net.

Net ST Rating
+0.62
expected pts/game
Kicking
-0.23
own kicking game
Kick Defense
-0.23
vs opponent kicks
Returns
-0.32
own return game
Return Defense
+1.39
vs opponent returns

Performance vs Perception

Our opponent-adjusted model rank vs. how others rate this team. Descriptive — where the model and the consensus disagree.

Model Rank
#100
opponent-adjusted strength
AP Poll
NR
Market (Vegas)
#72
market 28 higher
Recruiting Rank
#38
recruiting 62 spots higher
0 blue-chip recruits

Peer Context

Where Southern Miss ranks among all FBS teams in 2020 (percentile).

Opp-adjusted offense
36th
Opp-adjusted defense
17th
Offensive EPA/play
36th
Defensive EPA/play
22th
Offensive success rate
28th
Explosiveness
65th
Defensive havoc
20th
Points per drive
43th

Historical Fingerprint

Most statistically similar team-seasons, 2017–2025, by the same 44-feature profile The Archive uses. Descriptive context, not a forecast.

1Wake Forest2018OA +0.021 / -0.032similar: offensive EPA, takeaway rate, havoc rate3932North Texas2019OA -0.041 / -0.097similar: turnover rate, rushing offense, defensive success rate3653Pittsburgh2017OA +0.004 / -0.016similar: pass defense, passing offense, offensive EPA3644Houston2019OA +0.003 / -0.090similar: takeaway rate, TD drive rate, defensive success rate3635Kentucky2017OA +0.002 / -0.044similar: TD drive rate, passing offense, pass defense359

2020 Schedule & Results

10 games

WkOpponentScoreW/LSpreadATSTotalO/U
1vs South Alabama21-32L----
3vs Louisiana Tech30-31L-5.5L58.5O
4vs Tulane24-66L+3.5L54.5O
5@ North Texas41-31W+1.5W71.5O
8@ Liberty35-56L+11.0L63O
9vs Rice6-30L-1.5L59.25U
10vs North Alabama24-13W----
11@ Western Kentucky7-10L+5.5W49.5U
12vs UTSA20-23L+10.0W52U
15vs Florida Atlantic45-31W----

Betting Profile

ATS Record
4-5
44.4%
O/U Record
5-4
55.6%
Straight Up
3-7
30.0%
Home ATS2-4
Away ATS2-1
Favorite ATS0-3
Underdog ATS4-2
Last 5 ATS
LWWW
Full ATS log & splits →
Graded against consensus market lines (median across multiple sportsbooks). Games the market never lined — mostly early-season non-FBS matchups — are excluded from ATS and O/U records; individual games may grade differently than closing-line sources.

Situational Profile

Situational EPA percentile across 8 phases (the larger the shape, the more dominant). Within-FBS ranks.

Pass Off39thRush Off37thRed Zone Off47th3rd Down Off40thPass Def16thRush Def33thRed Zone Def12th3rd Down Def17th
SituationOFF EPAOFF RankDEF EPADEF Rank
Overall-0.03035th+0.09321th
Red Zone-0.03047th+0.19412th
Third Down+0.01140th+0.28317th
No Garbage Time-0.02637th+0.09523th
First Half-0.03633th+0.10626th
Second Half-0.02437th+0.07932th
Early Downs-0.08818th+0.06027th
Passing Downs-0.02739th+0.17816th
Standard Downs-0.03237th+0.05133th
Goal to Go+0.00848th+0.10541th

Style & Tendencies

Pass 42.6%Rush 57.4%
Havoc/Game
10.7
Havoc Rate
14.8%
TO Margin
-0.4
Explosive/G
15.7
Yards/Game
372.0
Pts/Drive
2.07
3rd Down%
42.2%
3&Out%
19.8%

Team Statistics

2020 season totals across 10 games — Southern Miss vs. the combined line of every opponent in those games.
StatSouthern MissOpponents
Scoring
Points253323
Points / Game25.332.3
First Downs
Total188215
Rushing83102
Passing93103
Penalty1210
Rushing
Attempts369403
Yards1,5901,809
Yards / Carry4.34.5
Yards / Game159.0180.9
Touchdowns1817
Passing
Attempts274294
Completions171185
Completion %62.4%62.9%
Yards2,1302,208
Yards / Attempt7.87.5
Touchdowns1224
Interceptions96
Passer Rating135.59148.87
Total Offense
Plays643697
Yards3,7204,017
Yards / Play5.85.8
Yards / Game372.0401.7
Punt Returns
Returns96
Yards6324
Average7.04.0
Touchdowns00
Kickoff Returns
Returns3123
Yards678501
Average21.921.8
Touchdowns10
Punting
Punts4035
Yards1,5501,581
Average38.845.2
Interception Returns
Returns69
Yards41123
Touchdowns00
Fumbles
Fumbles1114
Lost76
Penalties
Penalties4444
Yards367374
Yards / Game36.737.4
Time of Possession
Per Game29:0730:53
Third Downs
Attempts135142
Conversions5768
Conversion %42.2%47.9%
Fourth Downs
Attempts1721
Conversions614
Conversion %35.3%66.7%
Red Zone
Trips3833
Scores (TD + FG)3130
Score %81.6%90.9%
Touchdowns2223
TD %57.9%69.7%
Field Goals
Attempts1614
Made1210
Pct75.0%71.4%
PAT Kicking
Attempts2941
Made2939
Pct100.0%95.1%
Two-Point Conversions
Attempts21
Made10
Official-stats conventions: rushing includes sacks as negative attempts (NCAA), so Total Offense = rush + pass. Red-zone Score % counts touchdowns and field goals per trip.
Compare to any opponent →Find similar matchups →Team identity →Situational splits →